The aim of this study was to genotype a series of papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs) and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas (ATCs) for BRAF mutation, and to evaluate p53 and SOX2 expression as factors implicated in tumour progression.
Mutational inactivation of this aspect of p53 activity occurs frequently in many human neoplasms, including astrocytomas, and is thought to represent a critical step in tumor progression.
To identify the prognostic value of c-jun, c-fos, and p53 in oral cancer, we examined the impact of immunohistochemical expression of these markers on tumor progression in 157 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).
Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene frequently result in expression of p53 point mutants that accumulate in cancer cells and actively collaborate with tumor progression through the acquisition of novel properties.
It seems that loss of wild-type p53 gene function and consequent p53 overexpression may be involved in early stages of tumor progression while DCC abnormalities are a late event.
Increased expression of p53 was associated with tumor progression because it was overexpressed in 45% of the adenomas and 65% of the adenocarcinomas (P<0.05).
Our results indicate that p53 protein is expressed in a number of central nervous system neoplasms, and suggest that in astrocytic tumors a possible association may exist between p53 protein expression and tumor progression through increasing histological grades of malignancy.
Multiple evidences implicate that over-expression of MDM4 is associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis which can be reversed by knockdown of MDM4 expression or restoration of p53 function, and support the rationale for the design of future MDM4-specific therapeutics.
Of interest, TrkC was proposed to constrain tumor progression in neuroblastoma (NB), and we demonstrate in an avian model that TrkC tumor suppressor activity requires Hey1 and p53.
Our findings show that Rb1 and p53 inactivation are associated with aggressive plasma cell dyscrasias, suggesting a role for these lesions in tumor progression rather than initiation.
These studies suggest that functional inactivation of p53 by HTLV-1 Tax, whether by mutation or another mechanism, is not critical for initial tumor formation, but contributes to late-stage tumor progression.
Logistic regression analysis revealed that the risk factors of a tumorous histotype were the positive expression of p53 (odds ratio [OR] = 18.214) or COX-2 (OR = 42.703), and no reciprocal relationship to neoplastic progression was recognized with p53, p16 and COX-2.
While these findings support a role for p53 in tumour progression, abnormal p53 expression does not appear to have any significant prognostic effect in carcinoma.
Furthermore, the higher proliferative activity in homogeneous-aneuploid carcinomas and their more frequent overexpression of p53 support the hypothesis that in gastric cancer tumour progression implies the development of a dominant and more aggressive (higher proliferative activity, p53 overexpression) aneuploid cell clone.
Tumor progression is characterized by (1) increased expression of E6 and E7 genes of high risk HPVs, known to bind to and inactivate p53 and pRb oncosuppressors, respectively; (2) integration of viral DNA into host genome, with disruption of E2 viral genes and host chromosomal loci; and (3) molecular alterations of key regulators of cell cycle.
In the overall series of cases, p53 overexpression was associated with tumor progression (hazard ratio [HR]=3.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-8.48, P=.02), but this association was even stronger if having any alteration in any of the 2 genes was considered (HR=3.51, 95% CI 1.34-9.21, P=.01).
Recent findings demonstrated that HIPK2 inhibitions do exist in tumors and depend by several mechanisms including HIPK2 cytoplasmic localization, protein degradation, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH), recapitulating the biological outcome obtained by RNA interference studies in tumor cells, such as p53 inactivation, resistance to therapies, apoptosis inhibition, and tumor progression.
P53 mutants not only lose the physiological tumor-suppressive activity of the wild-type p53 protein but also acquire novel powerful oncogenic functions, referred to as gain of function, that may actively confer a selective advantage during tumor progression.
There is a dynamic subcellular epithelial expression of HMGB1 (loss of nuclear, emergence of cytoplasmic), associated with epithelial p53 expression and differential immune cell phenotype in oesophageal neoplastic progression.
These results suggest that inactivation of P53 may lead to genetic instability in a subset of prostate carcinomas enabling them to achieve properties, such as AR gene amplification, that allow them to grow in low levels of androgens and therefore cause tumour progression.
PLK1 expression was determined in 160 gastric carcinoma patients by immunohistochemistry and compared with p53 expression and the proliferating cell nuclear antigen-labeling index (PCNA-LI) to evaluate the effect of PLK1 on tumor progression.