Compared with carriers of either XRCC1 194Trp homozygote or RAD9 239Arg heterozygote variants, noncarriers were at a significantly decreased risk for lung cancer (odds ratio [OR], 0.282; confidence interval [CI], 0.089-0.893).
In the current German study, we investigated the role of XRCC1-polymorphisms as a genetic modifier of risk for individuals with lung cancer as susceptible genotypes, especially in relation to tobacco smoking.
Previous studies have suggested that certain genetic polymorphisms, specifically the Xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD) gene codon 751 and the X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) gene codon 399 polymorphisms, were associated with an increased risk of lung cancer, and, in some studies, with a greater risk for mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene in lung tumors.
In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicates that XRCC1 -77T>C shows an increased lung cancer risk and XRCC3 T241M polymorphism is associated with decreased lung cancer risk, especially in Caucasians.
Taken together, these findings show that the functional c.1161G>A and c.1779C>G genetic variants of XRCC1 are associated with lung cancer susceptibility in the Chinese Han populations and might be used as molecular markers for evaluating the risk of lung cancer.
Using the multifactor dimensionality reduction method, we found a model of gene-gene interactions associated with the risk of lung cancer: NBS1 (rs1805794)-XRCC1 (rs25487)-hOGG1 (rs1052133)-XPG (rs17655).
Haplotype analysis illustrated haplotype block 11 (CGAGG) carrying minor allele for XRCC1 206 was associated with the highest risk towards lung cancer on the contrary block 4 (CAGAG) carrying mutant allele for XRCC1 399 significantly decreased the risk.
Presence of the XRCC1 399Gln allele was associated with a significantly decreased risk for lung cancer among non-smoking women (odds ratio (OR) 0.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-0.9).
We identified a sufficient number of epidemiologic studies on lung cancer to conduct a meta-analysis for genetic polymorphisms in nucleotide base repair (BER) pathway, focusing on 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1, X-ray cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) and apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1.
In the present case-control study with 178 Japanese incident lung cancer cases and 449 age- and sex-matched controls, we investigated the gene-environment interaction among APE1 Asp148Glu, XRCC1Arg399Gln and smoking habit in lung cancer risk.
Our results suggest that the XRCC1 Pro206Pro polymorphism or the haplotype encompassing the minor allele may contribute to genetic susceptibility for lung cancer in this northeastern Chinese population.
To unravel its genetic underpinnings, we sought to investigate the association of three well-characterized nonsynonymous polymorphisms in XRCC1 (Arg194Trp and Arg399Gln) and XRCC3 (Thr241Met) genes with lung cancer risk in northeastern Chinese.
These preliminary results suggested that the XRCC1 c.1178G>A genetic polymorphism is statistically associated with lung cancer risk in the Chinese population.
The pooled results showed that there was a significant association between XRCC1rs3213245 polymorphism and lung cancer risk (allele model: OR =1.31, 95% CI 1.13-1.51, P < 0.001; homozygote model: OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.13-1.79, P = 0.003; recessive model: OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.13-1.71, P = 0.002; dominant model: OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.17-1.47, P < 0.001).
In conclusion, these preliminary results suggest that the C > T, rs1799782 and C > T, rs25487 of XRCC1 genetic variants might be used as molecular markers for detecting lung cancer susceptibility.
CONCLUSIONS Taken together, T-77C and Arg399Gln polymorphisms of the XRCC1 gene, as well as the 186C>T and Val158Met polymorphisms of the COMT gene, increased the risk of lung cancer in non-smoking women, with the factors of occupation type, cooking-oil fumes, and soot exposures representing key contributing factors.
Our meta-analysis on 2861 cases (lung cancer patients) and 2783 controls from eight eligible studies in Chinese populations showed that for the XRCC1Arg194Trp polymorphism, compared with the Arg/Arg homozygous genotype, the variant Arg/Trp and Trp/Trp genotypes combined was not associated with lung cancer risk (OR=1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.89-1.27) (Z=0.70, P=0.48), nor was Arg280His (OR=0.63, 95% CI=0.28-1.41) (Z=1.12, P=0.26); however, for the XRCC1Arg399Gln polymorphism, the combination of variant Arg/Gln and Gln/Gln genotypes was borderline significantly associated with lung cancer risk (OR=1.16, 95% CI=1.00-1.36) (Z=1.90, P=0.06), compared with the Arg/Arg homozygous genotype.