Gene Score gda Association Type Type Original DB Sentence supporting the association PMID PMID Year
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 Biomarker disease BEFREE IGF1 was found to increase the T2DM susceptibility as well as advanced DR, i.e., PDR, while VEGFA was found to be associated with early DR stage, i.e., NPDR. 31473834 2020
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 Biomarker disease BEFREE During the follow up, 16 (5.84%) participants developed non proliferative DR and 9 (3.64%) progressed to PDR while the mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and red cell distribution width (RDW) MCV rose. 30103306 2019
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 Biomarker disease BEFREE Eighty-six eyes from 57 patients with diabetes (19 with no DR, 19 with non-proliferative DR [NPDR], and 19 with proliferative DR [PDR] who had undergone photocoagulation) and 10 eyes from 10 patients without diabetes were recruited. 31001668 2019
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 GeneticVariation disease BEFREE Rs10061133 in MIR449b is significantly associated with a decreased risk of PDR and sight-threatening DR in Caucasian patients with type 1 diabetes. 31546259 2019
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 Biomarker disease BEFREE For accuracy, the severe and PDR groups were merged, representing the high-risk DR group for receiver operator characteristic analysis. 30933259 2019
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 Biomarker disease BEFREE Panretinal leakage index [mild NPDR (mean = 0.51%), moderate NPDR mean = 1.20%, severe NPDR (mean = 2.75%), and PDR (mean = 5.84%); P<2×10<sup>-16</sup>], panretinal ischemic index [mild NPDR (mean = 0.95%, moderate NPDR (mean = 1.37%), severe NPDR (mean = 2.80%), and PDR (mean = 9.53%); P<2×10<sup>-16</sup>], and panretinal microaneurysm count [mild NPDR (mean = 36), moderate NPDR (mean = 129), severe NPDR (mean = 203), and PDR (mean = 254); P<5×10<sup>-7</sup>] were strongly associated with DR severity. 31383482 2019
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 Biomarker disease BEFREE The study population included 292 adults with diabetes, with and without DR. DR (better eye) was categorised as presence and absence of any DR; severity of DR (no vision-threatening DR (VTDR); severe non-proliferative DR (NPDR); PDR and/or clinically significant macular oedema and VTDR). 30361276 2019
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 Biomarker disease BEFREE This paper summarizes the recent studies about CTGF on DR fibrosis for a comprehensive understanding of the role and mechanism of CTGF in PDR. 30225233 2018
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 Biomarker disease BEFREE sCD40L plasma concentrations were measured in 205 type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients without DR (DWR; n=50) and with DR (n=155), the latter subdivided into non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy [NPDR; n=98 (63.2%)], or proliferative retinopathy [PDR; n=57 (36.8%)] patients. 30149416 2018
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 GeneticVariation disease BEFREE The diabetic cohort included four subgroups (35 eyes without diabetic retinopathy, 30 eyes with mild to moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy [NPDR], 27 eyes with severe NPDR, and 26 eyes with PDR). 29677360 2018
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 Biomarker disease BEFREE In this cross-sectional study, we examined 33 eyes from 33 patients with diabetes mellitus who underwent a vitrectomy (non-proliferative DR [NPDR, n = 8]; PDR with simple vitreous haemorrhage [VH, n = 17]; or PDR with a fibrovascular proliferative membrane [FVM, n = 8]). 28299499 2018
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 Biomarker disease BEFREE Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were estimated for patients with DME, PDR, and vision-threatening DR, compared with persons without these conditions, by using individual participant data followed by a standard inverse-variance meta-analysis (2-step analysis). 28472362 2017
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 GeneticVariation disease BEFREE A total of 650 participants (495 [76.2%] nonproliferative DR [NPDR], 155 proliferative DR [PDR]) were analyzed; 302 (46.5%) were women and mean (SD) age was 61 (10) years; 425 (65.4%) were white. 28448655 2017
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 GeneticVariation disease BEFREE Any DR, vision-threatening DR (VTDR), treatment coverage rates (proportion of participants with proliferative DR [PDR], clinically significant macular edema [CSME], or both who had evidence of retinal scatter and focal laser treatment). 28318640 2017
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 Biomarker disease BEFREE The prevalence of DR was 43.1% (95% confidence interval 39.6%-46.6%), with mild, moderate, and severe NPDR and PDR to be 9.41%, 7.46%, 11.1%, and 12.1%, respectively. 28669781 2017
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 Biomarker disease BEFREE Conventional MRI was performed in 45 diabetic patients, 30 of whom had diabetic retinopathy (DR) involvement (half PDR, and half NPDR) and 15 of whom were diabetic patients without retinopathy and with normal ophthalmologic examination. 27846040 2017
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 Biomarker disease BEFREE Serum levels of MCP-1 protein in patients classified as diabetic without retinopathy (DWR) and DR, including NPDR and PDR, were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. 25981750 2016
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 Biomarker disease BEFREE Eight haplotype-tagging SNPs of SERPING1 and C5 were genotyped in 570 subjects with type 2 diabetes: 295 DR patients (138 nonproliferative DR [NPDR] and 157 proliferative DR [PDR]) and 275 diabetic controls. 26989329 2016
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 Biomarker disease BEFREE We first conducted a genome-wide association study of 1007 individuals, comparing 570 subjects with ≥8 years duration without DR (controls) with 437 PDR (cases) in the Chinese discovery cohort. 23562823 2013
Entrez Id: 5171
Gene Symbol: PDR
PDR
0.100 GeneticVariation disease BEFREE Thr21Met (T21M) and Ser89Asn (S89N) polymorphisms of the UTS2 gene were associated with the risk of developing diabetes and DR. M21M genotype frequencies were high in PDR (8.9% in diabetic control vs. 54.6% in PDR, P = 0.0092) group. 22587369 2012