Genetic and epigenetic analyses were positive in 6/36 MSI-H CRCs and 0/23 MSI-H GCs with pathological mutation in major mismatch repair genes, and in 7/36 MSI-H CRCs and 18/23 MSI-H GCs with methylated hMLH1 promoter (P<0.01), respectively.
Families with clinical diagnosis of HNPCC (i.e. family history which fulfills the Amsterdam I/II criteria) was the strongest predictor for finding a deleterious mutation, and stomach cancer was the most commonly reported extra-colonic cancer in families found with a deleterious MLH1 or MSH2 mutation.
High intake of vegetables and low intake of potato were associated with increased likelihood of gastric cancer with hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter.
Previously, we suggested that HM in the proximal region of the hMLH1 promoter plays a critical role in progression of gastric cancer with MSI and this specific region should be analyzed for diagnostic use of hMLH1 HM.
For determination of association between DNA methylation pattern or histological type and CIMP status in gastric carcinoma, CpG islands in the promoters of hMLH1 and CDH1 genes, CpG islands overlapping exon 1 of MGMT and p16(INK4a) genes, and a non-CpG island in exon 1 of the RAR-beta gene were studied.
Five different classes of methylation behaviors were found: (1) genes methylated in GC only (GSTP1 and RASSF1A); (2) genes showing low methylation frequency (<12%) in CG, IM, and GA, but significantly higher methylation frequency in GC (COX-2, hMLH1, and p16); (3) a gene with low and similar methylation frequency (8.8-21.3%) in four-step lesions (MGMT); (4) genes with high and similar methylation frequency (53-85%) in four-step lesions (APC and E-cadherin); and (5) genes showing an increasing tendency with or without fluctuation of the methylation frequency along the progression (DAP-kinase, p14, THBS1, and TIMP3).
The complete association between HM in hMLH1-C and MSI phenotype with gastric cancer provides an alternative diagnostic tool for detecting a favorable prognostic subgroup with MSI by using simple methylation analysis.
Examples of genes involved in pathogenesis of GC include p53, adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), beta-catenin, E-cadherin, transforming growth factor (TGF)-betaRII, and hMLH1.
Therefore, detection of hMLH1 methylation in nonneoplastic gastric epithelia may be useful for screening patients who may be at risk of developing gastric cancer.
Four disease groups and their healthy family members were assembled according to the presentation of gastric cancer: FG, familial clustering of gastric cancer (n = 32); CG, family with one or more colorectal and gastric cancers in first-degree relatives (n = 22); HS, seven HNPCC families corresponding to the Amsterdam criteria (AMS+) and 12 suspected HNPCC families which did not satisfy one of the criteria (AMS-), but no gastric cancer among first- and second-degree relatives (n = 19); and SG, sporadic gastric cancer (n = 33).
Our results suggest that the mRNA expression levels for pro-methylating (DNMT1, DNMT3a, DNMT3b) and anti-methylating (MBD2) enzymes is not a critical determinate of tumor-specific promoter hypermethylation of hMLH1, p(16INK4a), or CDH1 in gastric carcinoma.
We analyzed 33 tumors from 15 patients with multiple gastric carcinoma (12 double tumors and three triple tumors) for MSI, expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2, and hypermethylation of hMLH1 and hMSH2 promoters.
Inactivation of hMLH1 expression by promoter hypermethylation may be an early event in carcinogenesis of this type of gastric cancer, preceding the development of the clear MSI phenotype of papillary carcinoma.