microRNA-21 was up-regulated in HER2 positive and Basal-like breast cancer types, while microRNA-206 was up-regulated in Luminal A and B types of breast cancer. microRNA-21 expression negatively correlated with the level of ER and PR but positively correlated with HER2 expression and tumor malignancy, while microRNA-206 showed the opposite trend.
We matched concordant tumor as luminal A and HR+/HER2-, luminal B and HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+ and HER2-enriched, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and normal- or basal-like.
Significantly, acquisition of radioresistance in MCF-7 and ZR-751 cell lines resulted in a loss of expression of both ERα and PgR and an increase in EGFR expression; based on transcriptomic data they changed subtype classification from their parental luminal A to HER2-overexpressing (MCF-7 RR) and normal-like (ZR-751 RR) subtypes, indicating the extent of phenotypic changes and cellular plasticity involved in this process.
Breast cancer tissues of HER2 overexpression and Basal-like were more significant than Luminal A and Luminal B. MIIP was obviously downregulated and IGFBP2 was upregulated in MDA-MB-231, SKBR3 and MCF-7 versus MCF-10A especially in MDA-MB-231.
The training dataset comprised 91 patients (luminal A, n = 49; luminal B, n = 8; HER2-enriched, n = 11; triple negative, n = 23), while the validation dataset comprised 52 patients from a second institution (luminal A, n = 17; luminal B, n = 17; triple negative, n = 18).
Furthermore, luminal B (OR = 3.311, 95% CI 1.593-6.884; P = 0.001) and HER2 overexpression (OR = 4.308, 95% CI 1.097-16.912; P = 0.036) were independent and statistically significant predictor of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis versus luminal A.
Three-marker immunohistochemical clinical subtypes were defined as Luminal A (ER+ or PR+/HER2-), Luminal B (ER+ or PR+/HER2+), Triple Negative (ER-/PR-/HER2-), and HER2+ (ER-/PR-/HER2+).
The aims of the current study were (1) to analyze invasive breast carcinomas using standardized 4-IHC and quantitative image analysis and (2) to compare the results obtained in the classification of biological subtypes using current Ki67 and PR threshold values proposed by different authors to sub-classifying the luminal A-like and the luminal B-like (HER2-negative) subtypes.
We classified breast cancer cases into four subtypes using information on tumor marker expression such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Cerb2 receptor (HER2); luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2-), luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2+), HER2-overexpressing (ER-, PR-, and HER2+), and triple-negative (ER-, PR-, and HER2-).
Intrinsic subtypes were defined as follows: Luminal A, ER or PR >0%, HER2-negative, PR >10% and Ki67 < 14%; Luminal B, ER or PR >0%, (PR ≤10% or HER2-positive or Ki67 ≥ 14%); HER2E, ER 0%, PR 0%, HER2 positive; Core basal, ER 0%, PR 0%, HER2 negative and EGFR positive.
The distribution of tumor molecular subtypes according PAM50 was: 60% luminal B, 30% luminal A and 10% human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2) enriched.
The aims of the current study were (1) to analyze invasive breast carcinomas using standardized 4-IHC and quantitative image analysis and (2) to compare the results obtained in the classification of biological subtypes using current Ki67 and PR threshold values proposed by different authors to sub-classifying the luminal A-like and the luminal B-like (HER2-negative) subtypes.
Triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive subtypes had significantly higher TIL densities than luminal A or B (HER2-negative) subtypes (p < 0.001).
The CART model identified four risk layers: group 1 (SUVmax ≤6.75 and tumor size ≤2.0 cm); group 2 (SUVmax ≤6.75 and Luminal A [LumA] or TN tumor >2.0 cm); group 3 (SUVmax ≤6.75 and Luminal B [LumB] or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]-enriched] tumor >2.0 cm); group 4 (SUVmax >6.75).
Immunohistochemical surrogates for molecular subtypes were defined as Luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2-), Luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2+), HER2-enriched (ER-, PR- and HER2+) and basal-like (triple negative).
In the group that started with taxanes and anthracyclines, for HER2-enriched, Luminal B or Basal-like subtype, postT1 could be used as the ideal time point during chemotherapy; for Luminal A subtype, postT2 as the ideal time point during chemotherapy.
Especially the differentiation between Her2-positive and Luminal A (HR=4.41, CI 1.53-18.71, P=0.004) and Luminal B (HR=1.96, CI 0.99-4.08, P=0.053) respectively was an independent prognostic parameter for CSS.
Multivariate logistic regression models were built to assess HER2 positive BC risk, comparing (a) triple positive (TP) with luminal A, luminal B and triple negative (TN) and (b) HER2-enriched group with luminal A, luminal B and TN.
Lysyl oxidase positivity was associated with progesterone receptor negativity ( p = 0.001), and monoamine oxidase A positivity was associated with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negativity ( p = 0.003) and the luminal A subtype ( p = 0.003).
Patients were divided into four groups based on the tumor molecular subtype: luminal A (Estrogen Receptor [ER]/Progesterone Receptor [PR] positive, human epithelial growth factor receptor-2 [HER2] negative), luminal B (ER/PR positive, HER2 Positive), HER2 (HER2 positive and ER/PR negative), and Triple negative (TNBC).