However, the difference became significant when considering intermediate cytogenetics (5-year EFS: 49% vs 29%; P = .02), especially cytogenetically normal AML (5-year EFS: 48% vs 31%; P = .04), which was related to lower relapse rate and less toxicity.
Significant associations between CPT1A<sup>high</sup> and adverse outcomes were further validated whether for all AML patients (OS: P=0.008; EFS: P=0.002, n=334, no M3) or for National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Intermediate-Risk subgroup (OS: P=0.021, EFS: P=0.024, n=173).
EVI1(+)ME(-) expression predicts an extremely poor prognosis distinguishable from the general EVI1(+) AML patients (overall survival [OS]: P < .001 and event-free survival [EFS]: P = .002).
<i>IDH</i> mutations seemed not to affect overall survival (OS: HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.89-1.23) and event-free survival (EFS: HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80-1.18) when considered as a single factor, but improved accumulative incidence of relapse (CIR: HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.18-1.76) in patients with intermediate-risk karyotypes (IR-AML).
AML were stratified by LSC17 quartile groups (lowest 25%, intermediate 50% and highest 25%) and children with low LSC17 score had significantly better event-free survival (EFS: HR = 3.35 (95%CI = 1.64-6.82), P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS: HR = 3.51 (95%CI = 1.38-8.92), P = 0.008) compared with patients with high LSC17 scores.
Sixteen studies were included.TET2 mutation was an unfavorable prognostic factor for overall survival (OS: HR = 1.386; P < 0.001) and event-free survival (EFS: HR = 1.594; P = 0.002) in patients with AML.