<i>TP53, KRAS, APC</i>) has limited diagnostic sensitivity (40-60%), however, methylated DNA including <i>SEPT9, SFRP1, SDC2</i> can be applied with higher sensitivity (up to 90%) for CRC.Circulating miRNAs (e.g. miR-21, miR-92, miR-141) provide comparably high sensitivity for CRC as the circulating tumor cell mRNA markers (e.g.EGFR, CK19, CK20, CEA).
Survival analysis revealed that low expression of four of the ten genes, carcinoembryonic antigen related cell adhesion molecule 7 (CEACAM7), solute carrier family 4 member 4 (SLC4A4), glucagon (GCG) and chloride channel accessory 1 (CLCA1) genes, were associated with unfavorable prognosis in CRC.
Further verification confirmed the elevated plasma BST2 levels in CRC patients (2.35 ± 0.13 ng/mL) versus controls (1.04 ± 0.03 ng/mL) (p < 0.01), with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) being 0.858 comparable to that of CEA (0.867).
In vivo, a murine surrogate of HERA-CD40L-stimulated clonal expansion of OT-I-specific murine CD8 T cells and showed single agent antitumor activity in the CD40 syngeneic MC38-CEA mouse model of colorectal cancer, suggesting an involvement of the immune system in controlling tumor growth.
CEA and E-cadherin expressions were simultaneously assessed with regard to tumor progression in the various sites of colorectal carcinomas with liver metastasis.
The influence of CEA production by colorectal cancer cells on the function of E-cadherin junction complexes may explain the link between the elevated levels of CEA and the increase in soluble E-cadherin during the progression of colorectal cancer.
Univariate analysis showed that preoperative serum CEA, preoperative serum CA199, preoperative serum CA724, vascular invasion, and degree of differentiation were associated with lymph node metastasis in T1-stage CRC (<i>P</i> < 0.05 for all).
Extended evaluation of a phase 1/2 trial on dosing, safety, immunogenicity, and overall survival after immunizations with an advanced-generation Ad5 [E1-, E2b-]-CEA(6D) vaccine in late-stage colorectal cancer.
A combination of the LNR with pre-chemotherapy CEA and CA19-9, other independent risk factors, provided accurate risk stratification of RFS and conferred additional information on recurrence within each stage III CRC subgroup, which was then validated in an independent cohort.
More importantly, the combination of lncRNAs shows more sensitivity in the detection of early-stage CRC than the combination of CEA and CA19-9, biomarkers currently used for CRC detection (p < 0.0001).
Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that combined detection of PCT and CEA appears to be a more effective marker to distinguish CRC patients from CA patients, with 70% sensitivity and 83% specificity.
Further analysis showed that RP11-296E3.2 sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of CRC metastasis is better than CEA in plasma (0.690 and 0.621, and 0.621 and 0.500, respectively), and the OS of metastatic CRC patients with higher LEF1-AS1 expression levels in tissues was short (log-rank p<0.05).
Clinical studies in colorectal cancer evaluating an ALVAC CEA candidate vaccine have shown that this approach is safe and can induce tumor-specific T cell responses.
<b>Results:</b> We found that <i>LLNCRNA SNHG14</i>, hsa-miRNA-3940-5p and <i>NAP1L2</i> mRNA had an excellent performance characteristics and more superior than CEA, and CA19.9 for differentiating CRC from controls.
Dysregulation of carcinoembryonic antigen group members CGM2, CD66a (biliary glycoprotein), and nonspecific cross-reacting antigen in colorectal carcinomas. Comparative analysis by northern blot and in situ hybridization.