Receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) revealed that miR-145 in UEVs combined with serum PSA could differentiate PCa from BPH better than PSA alone (AUC 0.863 and AUC 0.805, respectively).
Currently prostate-specific antigen is used for prostate cancer (PCa) screening, however it lacks the necessary specificity for differentiating PCa from other diseases of the prostate such as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), presenting a clinical need to distinguish these cases at the molecular level.
The mRNA PSA expression in needle biopsy material did not seem to be related to PSA circulating levels in prostate cancer patients (r = 0.281), whereas in BPH patients the two parameters correlated significantly (r = 0.667, p < 0.01).
The results indicate that allelic variation in PSA promoter activity may be androgen dependent and interaction of genes in androgen pathway may influence the risk of BPH and PC in Singapore males.
The effect of Trigonella foenum-graecum extract on prostate-specific antigen, and prostate function in otherwise healthy men with benign prostate hyperplasia.
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) lacks specificity and sensitivity in discriminating prostate cancer (PCa) from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) when the total PSA (tPSA) level is between 4 and 10 ng/mL.
CYP19 1531 C>T, SRD5A2 gene V89L, CYP17 gene -34 T/C, PSA-158 (G/A) regions were evaluated for the association between polymorphisms and benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer in study population.
Tumor doubling times were overestimated in patients with large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia since hyperplasia increases serum PSA, albeit 12 times less than cancer.
We first profiled global serum miRNAs in a pilot set of PCa and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) cases undergoing TRUS-guided prostate biopsy due to elevated PSA levels.
PSA level was significantly higher in the PCa group than in BPH (18.2 versus 9 ng/mL, <i>p</i> < 0.01), while volume of prostate gland was significantly higher in the BPH group than in PCa (39.1 versus 31.1 cm<sup>3</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.02).
In addition, effects of the 14 SNPs on BPH related clinical traits, including International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), prostate volume, total PSA, and free PSA were evaluated using linear regression analysis.
Statistical analysis showed that plasmatic exosomes expressing both CD81 and PSA were significantly higher in PCa as compared to both BPH and CTR, reaching 100% specificity and sensitivity in distinguishing PCa patients from healthy individuals.
As BPH-related factors, International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, maximal flow rate, postvoid residual volume, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, prostate calculi, and medication state for BPH were investigated.
With the more sensitive nanoparticle-based lectin-immunoassay we detected a statistically significant increase in the PSA fucosylation in PCa tissue compared to benign tissue (p=0.001) and in urine from PCa patients compared to BPH patients (p=0.030), and an even greater discrimination (p=0.010) when comparing BPH patients to PCa patients with Gleason score≥7.
We have used a reverse transcription-PCR assay for prostate-specific antigen mRNA and an immunocytochemical staining method for cytokeratins to test this hypothesis in paired peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) specimens from 71 patients with clinically localized disease before radical prostatectomy, 14 patients with advanced-stage carcinoma of the prostate, and 30 controls (young healthy volunteers, patients without prostate disease, and patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia).Controls were negative in BM and PB.
This study was to determine whether PSCA mRNA positivity in preoperatively negative prostatic biopsy samples from BPH men with PSA > 4.0 ng/ml and/or suspicious DRE findings had predictive performance following TURP.
We found a significantly higher PSA/GG distribution in PC (30%) than either benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (18%) or population controls (16%) (P = 0.025).
All patients with BPH were divided into two groups according to international prostate symptom score (IPSS), prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, Q(max), and prostate volume.