Outcome comparisons between the two correction modalities were performed by grouping in different amounts (- 0.50 D, - 0.75 D) and axes (with the rule, WTR; against the rule, ATR; oblique, OBL) of astigmatism.
The TCA4 values correlated with anterior astigmatism preoperatively and postoperatively (P < .001) and with posterior astigmatism at the 1-year follow-up (P < .01).
Clinical outcomes and vector analysis of astigmatism were reviewed and compared between wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (WFG group) (STAR S4 IR with iDesign aberrometer; Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., Santa Ana, CA), topography-guided LASIK (TOPO group) (Allegretto Wave Eye-Q laser; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE group) (VisuMax laser; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany).
Clinical outcomes and vector analysis of astigmatism were reviewed and compared between wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (WFG group) (STAR S4 IR with iDesign aberrometer; Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., Santa Ana, CA), topography-guided LASIK (TOPO group) (Allegretto Wave Eye-Q laser; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE group) (VisuMax laser; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany).
Clinical outcomes and vector analysis of astigmatism were reviewed and compared between wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (WFG group) (STAR S4 IR with iDesign aberrometer; Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., Santa Ana, CA), topography-guided LASIK (TOPO group) (Allegretto Wave Eye-Q laser; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE group) (VisuMax laser; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany).
Predicting postoperative astigmatism based on preoperative results is not possible; however, in eyes with a high difference between TCA3 and TCA5, a reduction in corneal astigmatism after DMEK is likely.
Worse best-corrected visual acuity and higher mean astigmatism at visit C were found for OCA1A (20/104 and +4.08 ± 1.34) compared to OCA1B (20/59 and +2.30 ± 1.36; P < 0.0001) and OCA2 (20/66 and +2.53 ±1.21; P < 0.0001).
Keratometry (mean K), central and thinnest corneal thickness (CCT and TCT), anterior and posterior elevation (AE and PE), and astigmatism by means of Pentacam, and visual acuity (VA) were recorded for each patient.
However, differences between the Ophtha TOP topography and Lenstar, IOL-Master both in cornea curvature and the astigmatism should be noted clinically.
The posterior steep keratometry (Ks), flat keratometry (Kf), mean keratometry (Km), and astigmatism were randomly measured by two independent experienced operators using the Sirius and TMS-5 Scheimpflug-Placido systems.
However, differences between the Ophtha TOP topography and Lenstar, IOL-Master both in cornea curvature and the astigmatism should be noted clinically.
The polar value method was performed with anterior and posterior corneal astigmatism measured with Scheimpflug camera combined with Placido corneal topography (Sirius, CSO) and refractive astigmatism preoperatively and 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively.
Here we presented the changes in mRNA expression levels of three genes (MMP2, TIMP2, and TGFB2), all known to participate in extracellular matrix organization, at five regions of the cornea and sclera in chickens developing high myopia and astigmatism induced by form deprivation.
The posterior steep keratometry (Ks), flat keratometry (Kf), mean keratometry (Km), and astigmatism were randomly measured by two independent experienced operators using the Sirius and TMS-5 Scheimpflug-Placido systems.