In previous studies, mice expressing human <i>CEA</i> as a transgene (CEA.Tg mice) vaccinated with rMVA/rF-CEA-TRICOM overcame CEA immune tolerance by inducing anti-CEA‒specific immunity and regression of CEA-expressing tumors.
The vaccination regimen consisted of vaccinia virus expressing tumor antigens carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and mucin-1 (MUC-1) with three costimulatory molecules B7.1, ICAM-1 and LFA-3 (TRICOM) (PANVAC-V) and fowlpox virus expressing the same antigens and costimulatory molecules (PANVAC-F).
Phase I study of sequential vaccinations with fowlpox-CEA(6D)-TRICOM alone and sequentially with vaccinia-CEA(6D)-TRICOM, with and without granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, in patients with carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing carcinomas.
We have shown previously that a vaccine regimen composed of priming mice s.c. with recombinant vaccinia-CEA/TRICOM and boosting i.t. with recombinant fowlpox-CEA/TRICOM was superior to priming and boosting vaccinations using the conventional s.c. route in inducing T-cell responses specific for CEA.
CEA.Tg/MIN mice were vaccinated with an aggressive diversified prime/boost vaccine regimen: (a) a primary vaccine consisting of recombinant vaccinia virus-expressing CEA and a triad of costimulatory molecules (TRICOM): B7.1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3 (rV-CEA-TRICOM); and (b) a booster vaccine using CEA-TRICOM in a recombinant avipox (fowlpox) virus (rF-CEA-TRICOM).
The vaccines used were recombinant vaccinia virus containing the transgenes for CEA and three T-cell costimulatory molecules [B7-1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3, designated recombinant vaccinia (rV)-CEA/TRICOM], with each transgene under the control of individual poxvirus promoters, and a replication-defective avipox virus (fowlpox; rF) containing the same four transgenes (designated rF-CEA/TRICOM).
The studies reported here demonstrate: (a) A recombinant avipox (fowlpox, rF) vector expressing the signal 1 (CEA) and the B7-1 costimulatory molecule transgenes (designated rF-CEA/B7-1) is more potent in inducing CEA-specific T-cell responses than rF-CEA; one administration of recombinant fowlpox vector expressing CEA and three different costimulatory molecule transgenes (B7-1, ICAM-1, LFA-3, designated rF-CEA/TRICOM) was more potent in inducing CEA-specific T-cell responses than four vaccinations with rF-CEA or two vaccinations with rF-CEA/B7-1.
The recombinant poxvirus-based vaccine platform included Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara (rMVA) and fowlpox (rF) vectors as the driver immunogens both engineered to express the human carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and three murine costimulatory molecules B7.1, ICAM-1, LFA-3 (designated TRICOM).
The recombinant poxvirus-based vaccine platform included Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara (rMVA) and fowlpox (rF) vectors as the driver immunogens both engineered to express the human carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and three murine costimulatory molecules B7.1, ICAM-1, LFA-3 (designated TRICOM).
The vaccination regimen consisted of vaccinia virus expressing tumor antigens carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and mucin-1 (MUC-1) with three costimulatory molecules B7.1, ICAM-1 and LFA-3 (TRICOM) (PANVAC-V) and fowlpox virus expressing the same antigens and costimulatory molecules (PANVAC-F).
The vaccination regimen consisted of vaccinia virus expressing tumor antigens carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and mucin-1 (MUC-1) with three costimulatory molecules B7.1, ICAM-1 and LFA-3 (TRICOM) (PANVAC-V) and fowlpox virus expressing the same antigens and costimulatory molecules (PANVAC-F).
The vaccines used were recombinant vaccinia virus containing the transgenes for CEA and three T-cell costimulatory molecules [B7-1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3, designated recombinant vaccinia (rV)-CEA/TRICOM], with each transgene under the control of individual poxvirus promoters, and a replication-defective avipox virus (fowlpox; rF) containing the same four transgenes (designated rF-CEA/TRICOM).
Granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor was administered as a biological adjuvant with all vaccinations, either as a recombinant protein (with rV-CEA-TRICOM) or as a recombinant avipox virus (with rF-CEA-TRICOM).
The vaccines used were recombinant vaccinia virus containing the transgenes for CEA and three T-cell costimulatory molecules [B7-1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3, designated recombinant vaccinia (rV)-CEA/TRICOM], with each transgene under the control of individual poxvirus promoters, and a replication-defective avipox virus (fowlpox; rF) containing the same four transgenes (designated rF-CEA/TRICOM).
CEA.Tg/MIN mice were vaccinated with an aggressive diversified prime/boost vaccine regimen: (a) a primary vaccine consisting of recombinant vaccinia virus-expressing CEA and a triad of costimulatory molecules (TRICOM): B7.1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3 (rV-CEA-TRICOM); and (b) a booster vaccine using CEA-TRICOM in a recombinant avipox (fowlpox) virus (rF-CEA-TRICOM).
The studies reported here demonstrate: (a) A recombinant avipox (fowlpox, rF) vector expressing the signal 1 (CEA) and the B7-1 costimulatory molecule transgenes (designated rF-CEA/B7-1) is more potent in inducing CEA-specific T-cell responses than rF-CEA; one administration of recombinant fowlpox vector expressing CEA and three different costimulatory molecule transgenes (B7-1, ICAM-1, LFA-3, designated rF-CEA/TRICOM) was more potent in inducing CEA-specific T-cell responses than four vaccinations with rF-CEA or two vaccinations with rF-CEA/B7-1.
The studies reported here demonstrate: (a) A recombinant avipox (fowlpox, rF) vector expressing the signal 1 (CEA) and the B7-1 costimulatory molecule transgenes (designated rF-CEA/B7-1) is more potent in inducing CEA-specific T-cell responses than rF-CEA; one administration of recombinant fowlpox vector expressing CEA and three different costimulatory molecule transgenes (B7-1, ICAM-1, LFA-3, designated rF-CEA/TRICOM) was more potent in inducing CEA-specific T-cell responses than four vaccinations with rF-CEA or two vaccinations with rF-CEA/B7-1.
This study evaluated the histopathological effects in prostate biopsies of recombinant fowlpox (rF) virus-based vaccine engineered to present the PSA and 3 costimulatory molecules (collectively labeled as PSA-TRICOM).
The primary objective of this phase I study was to evaluate the clinical safety of a vaccine using recombinant vaccinia virus (prime) and recombinant fowlpox virus (boost) in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with prostate cancer.
Patients were given recombinant fowlpox-prostate specific antigen/triad of co-stimulatory molecules alone or recombinant vaccinia-prostate specific antigen/triad of co-stimulatory molecules followed by recombinant fowlpox-prostate specific antigen/triad of co-stimulatory molecules on a prime and boost schedule with or without recombinant-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor protein or recombinant fowlpox-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor vector.
Phase I study of sequential vaccinations with fowlpox-CEA(6D)-TRICOM alone and sequentially with vaccinia-CEA(6D)-TRICOM, with and without granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, in patients with carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing carcinomas.
Those patients in the combination arm received a "priming" vaccine with recombinant vaccinia (rV) PSA plus r V containing the T-cell costimulatory molecule B7.1 (rV-B7.1) followed by monthly booster vaccines with recombinant fowlpoxPSA.
Granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor was administered as a biological adjuvant with all vaccinations, either as a recombinant protein (with rV-CEA-TRICOM) or as a recombinant avipox virus (with rF-CEA-TRICOM).
Our data show that the H6 promoter was more efficient than SP to drive CIITA expression and that CIITA can enhance the levels of the gag/pro and env gene products only when infection is performed by FP single recombinants.