Regarding the efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy, the patient with an I326V mutation had progressive disease (+115%) despite no genetic alterations detected in the EGFR pathway that could drive resistance, suggesting an alternate resistance mechanism.
Additionally, the presence of BRAFV600E was tested in peripheral mononuclear blood cells (PBMCs) as well as brain biopsies from LCH-ND patients, and the response to BRAF-V600E inhibitor was evaluated in 4 patients with progressive disease.
The cut-off value was identified by receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis utilizing serial sampled plasmas of patients from EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) pretreatment to progressive-disease (PD).
In patients treated with anti-PD-1 and PD-L1, a high baseline radiomic score (relative to the median) was associated with a higher proportion of patients who achieved an objective response at 3 months (vs those with progressive disease or stable disease; p=0·049) and a higher proportion of patients who had an objective response (vs those with progressive disease or stable disease; p=0·025) or stable disease (vs those with progressive disease; p=0·013) at 6 months.
In this retrospective multicenter study with 60 patients suffering from inoperable or metastatic melanoma we evaluated the efficacy of re-challenge with a BRAF inhibitor (BRAF2) with or without MEK-inhibition after progressive disease upon previous treatment with a BRAF inhibitor (BRAF1) with or without MEK inhibition.
A 61-year-old woman with EGFR mutation positive stage IV lung adenocarcinoma was administered 1<sup>st</sup> generation EGFR-TKI for 8 months as the first line therapy, then chemotherapy and 2<sup>nd</sup> generation EGFR-TKI after progressive disease (PD).
Patients with progressive disease showed greater basal serum VEGFA and ovarian VEGFA/BMI1 pathway protein expression relative to patients with stable disease and responsive disease (P < 0.05).
Five of the 13 patients with <i>EGFR</i> mutations were treated with EGFR-TKIs, two of whom manifested a partial response, two stable disease, and one progressive disease.
Patients with EGFR-activating mutations (del19 and L858R) that progressed using first-line gefitinib treatment were enrolled and treated with gefitinib beyond PD plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup> q3w.
Exome analysis of patients with progressive disease (PD) revealed 1 CRC with high-level microsatellite instability and 1 instance of HER2 oncogene amplification; 3 of 4 remaining patients with PD had allergic reactions to cetuximab, while none of the subjects with PR or SD had this complication.
In the patient with clinical benefit, IHC analysis of tumor showed increased CD4, CD8, PD1, and PD-L1 levels compared with patients with progressive disease.
Patients with advanced or recurrent HER2-positive gastric adenocarcinoma who were diagnosed with progressive disease after the first-line trastuzumab-based therapy and developed pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma within 3 months after completion of trastuzumab-based therapy were enrolled in this study.
Tie2 trajectories were independently associated with pre-treatment tumor vascular characteristics, tumor response, progression free survival (HR for progression = 3.01, p = 0.00014; median PFS 248 vs. 348 days p = 0.0008) and the modeling of progressive disease (p < 0.0001), suggesting that Tie2 should be monitored clinically to optimize VEGF inhibitor use.
Heterogeneous responses were seen in patients with progressive disease as best response with a marked size decrease of the biopsied (cMET amplification positive) lesion and progression of other lesions. cMET amplification was not always mutually exclusive with other EGFR TKI resistance mechanisms.
Plasma beta-arrestin-1 levels were considerably higher in lung cancer patients than in healthy donors and were higher in patients who later experienced a progressive disease than in patients showing complete/partial response following EGFR inhibitor therapy.
Total duration of EGFR-TKI treatment before rebiopsy, TKI-free interval, EGFR-TKI treatment history immediately before rebiopsy, continuation of initial EGFR-TKI beyond progressive disease, progression-free survival after initial TKI treatment, and rebiopsy site (other than fluid samples) significantly influenced T790M status.
Patients experiencing HPD within the first 6 weeks of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment had significantly lower OS compared with patients with progressive disease (median OS, 3.4 months [95% CI, 2.8-7.5 months] vs 6.2 months [95% CI, 5.3-7.9 months]; hazard ratio, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.29-3.69]; P = .003).
This study aimed to analyze the characteristics and outcomes of patients suffering from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (EGFRm+) receiving gefitinib who remained clinically stable following confirmation of progressive disease (PD) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (R-PD) and identify those who benefited from tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy beyond PD.
Presented here is a case of stage IV NSCLC harboring an uncommon EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation that was maintained at minimal progressive disease for 54 months, with 36 months on the second-generation TKI afatinib.
Osimertinib was approved by the US Food & Drug Administration in November 2015 for patients whose tumors exhibited T790M mutation and for those with progressive disease on other EGFR TKIs.