Tumor Progression
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
phenotype |
BEFREE |
HIPK2 protein downregulation is induced by hypoxia and hyperglycemia and HIPK2 knockdown favors tumor progression and resistance to therapy other than a pseudohypoxic, inflammatory, and angiogenic cancer phenotype.
|
31414572 |
2019 |
Tumor Progression
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
phenotype |
BEFREE |
HIPK2 silencing in cancer cells leads to chemoresistance and cancer progression, in part due to p53 inhibition.
|
27901482 |
2017 |
Tumor Progression
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
phenotype |
BEFREE |
HIPK2 has several well-characterised tumour suppressor roles, but recent studies suggest it can also contribute to tumour progression, although the underlying mechanisms are unknown.
|
28692050 |
2017 |
Tumor Progression
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
phenotype |
BEFREE |
HIPK2 is involved in HPV-associated uterine cervical and cutaneous carcinogenesis through its binding of HPV E6, thereby preventing apoptosis and contributing to tumor progression.
|
28607924 |
2017 |
Tumor Progression
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
phenotype |
BEFREE |
HIPK2 expression tends to be decreased along tumor progression and may be involved with the invasive potential, suggesting a possible tumor suppressor role for HIPK2.
|
25711204 |
2015 |
Tumor Progression
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
phenotype |
BEFREE |
We propose that the metabolic changes acquired by cells after HIPK2 silencing may contribute to induce resistance to cell death in glucose restriction condition, and therefore be directly relevant for tumor progression.
|
23703384 |
2013 |
Tumor Progression
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
phenotype |
BEFREE |
Recent findings demonstrated that HIPK2 inhibitions do exist in tumors and depend by several mechanisms including HIPK2 cytoplasmic localization, protein degradation, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH), recapitulating the biological outcome obtained by RNA interference studies in tumor cells, such as p53 inactivation, resistance to therapies, apoptosis inhibition, and tumor progression.
|
22889244 |
2012 |
Tumor Progression
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
phenotype |
BEFREE |
Here, to further investigate the role of HIPK2 in p53 activation, we started with the finding that HIPK2 inhibition upregulated Nox1, a homolog of the catalytic subunit of the superoxide-generating NADPH oxidase, involved in tumor progression and ROS production.
|
20171273 |
2010 |
Tumor Progression
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
phenotype |
BEFREE |
There is compelling evidence that HIPK2 is also involved in the response to hypoxia by acting as co-suppressor of hypoxia inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), a major factor in cancer progression that activates the transcription of genes involved in angiogenesis, glucose metabolism and invasion.
|
20234185 |
2010 |
Tumor Progression
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
phenotype |
BEFREE |
HIPK2 has been implicated in restraining tumor progression by more than one mechanism, involving both its catalytic and transcriptional co-repressor functions.
|
19046997 |
2009 |
Tumor Progression
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
phenotype |
BEFREE |
These data, by revealing that beta(4) expression is transcriptionally repressed in tumors by HIPK2 and p53 to impair beta(4)-dependent tumor progression, suggest that loss of p53 function favors the formation of coactivator complex with the TA members of the p53 family to allow beta(4) transcription.
|
19567674 |
2009 |
Tumor Progression
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
phenotype |
BEFREE |
These data suggest that HIPK2 is involved in damaged-DNA repair taking part in restraining tumor progression, at least in part depending on p53 regulation.
|
17658469 |
2007 |