Oswestry Disability Index and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) pain and self-image at the 2-year follow-up were significantly inferior in the O group (Oswestry Disability Index: 32±9% vs. 25±13%, P=0.01; SRS-22 pain: 3.5±0.7 vs. 3.9±0.6, P=0.05; SRS-22 self-image: 3.5±0.6 vs. 3.8±0.9, P=0.03).
Information on musculoskeletal pain during the past four weeks in seven different body sites was reported by a structured questionnaire at baseline (n = 389) and by SMS and telephone interview during follow-up (n = 284).
The following significant associations were found (p<.001): PROMIS Pain Interference is dependent on age and SRS-22r Pain, Physical Function, and Patient Satisfaction; PROMIS Physical Function is dependent on age and SRS-22r Pain and Physical Function; PROMIS Anxiety is dependent on SRS-22r Mental Health; PROMIS Depression is dependent on age and SRS-22r Mental Health; and PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles is dependent on age and SRS-22r Pain, Physical Function (p=.011), Mental Health, and Patient Satisfaction.
A retrospective comparative study using patients' records, radiographs, the national inpatient registry, and Patient-rated outcome measures (PROM): Oswestry disability index (ODI), modif.SRS-24 questionnaire, WHO-Quality of life index (WHOQoL), Numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain.
However, 2 years after the surgery, ODI (38%), pain (3.5), self-image (3.0), and total (3.2) values of the SRS-22 for group NC were significantly worse than those (28%, 4.0, 3.4, and 3.5, respectively) for group C (P < 0.05).
Higher functional scores at baseline were associated with greater average improvements in both SRS-22r Activity (B = 0.62, p < 0.001) and PROMIS-PF (B = 0.40, p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSThe authors found strong correlations between the SRS-22r Pain and Activity domains with corresponding PROMIS-PI and -PF scores.
Higher preoperative Risser grade (P = 0.01) and lower preoperative SRS-22r mental health score (P < 0.01) were significantly related to a diminished preoperative SRS-22r pain score.
Patients were 40- to 80-years-old with ASLS, defined as lumbar coronal Cobb ≥30° and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) ≥20 or Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) ≤4.0 in pain, function, and/or self-image domains.
In AIS patients pediatric PROMIS pain interference and mobility correlate strongly with SRS-22 pain and function domains, while PROMIS peer relationships demonstrates moderate correlations with SRS-22 mental health and self-image.
In AIS patients pediatric PROMIS Pain Interference and Mobility correlate strongly with SRS-22 Pain and Function domains, while PROMIS Peer Relationships demonstrates moderate correlations with SRS-22 mental health and self-image.
According to the other model, a lower improvement in ODI for standing (< 30%; OR 2.68), SRS-22R pain (< 50%; OR 3.25) and SI/appearance (< 50%; OR 2.18) subdomains, and an inadequate restoration of the SVA from baseline (< 2 cm; OR 3.16) were associated with low satisfaction.
The SRS-22r function, self-image, pain, and mental health scores were moderately to strongly correlated with the following PROMIS domains: physical function (r = 0.53), satisfaction with participation in social roles (r = 0.51), pain (r = -0.60), and anxiety (r = -0.73).
The SRS-22 self-image score was the most differentiating domain, both in the younger and older age groups, and an additional significant factor in the older age group was pain and disability.
Considering SRS-22 results, it was revealed that the patient group scored higher, signaling better functioning with reference to pain level (p = 0.016), function/activity (p<0.001) and the total score (p<0.001).
RESULTS Weak correlations were found between SVA and ODI (r = 0.296, p < 0.05) and PT with NRS back pain and the SRSpain domain (r = -0.260, p < 0.05, and r = 0.282, p < 0.05, respectively).
After adding respective baseline HRQOL scores to the models, active patients were significantly more likely to reach the MCID for the SRS-22r pain domain (OR 1.72, p = 0.026) and PCS (OR 1.94, p = 0.013).
The bilateral RF group had less overall improvement in ODI (8.1 vs. 15.8; p=.02), SRS Subscore (0.51 vs. 0.85; p=.03), and SRSPain domain scores (0.48 vs. 0.95; p=.02) compared with the non-RF group at final follow-up.