Consistent with previous findings, several inhibitors of eIF2 activity, including sodium arsenite, thapsigargin, tunicamycin, and salubrinal, had no inhibitory effect on the translation of an mRNA bearing the HCV IRES, and all induced the phosphorylation of eIF2α.
Together, these observations support a model in which cellular stresses that induce eIF2α phosphorylation (e.g. treatment with IFNα) cause HCV IRES-directed translation to switch from an eIF2-dependent mode to an eIF5B-dependent mode, defining a tactic used by HCV to evade the INFα response.
However, translation of hepatitis C viral (HCV) mRNA is refractory to the inhibitory effects of eIF2α phosphorylation, which prevents translation by disrupting formation of the eIF2-GTP-Met-tRNA(i) ternary complex.
An interaction between the protein kinase (PKR)-eIF2-alpha phosphorylation homology domain (PePHD) within the E2 protein of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and cell protein kinase (PKR) may affect the control of protein synthesis and cell growth.
Two genomic regions of hepatitis C virus (HCV), the interferon sensitivity-determining region (ISDR) of the non-structural 5A gene (NS5A) and the protein kinase-RNA activated (PKR)-eukariotic transcription factor (eIF2-alpha) phosphorylation homology domain (PePHD) of the structural E2 gene, interact in vitro with the interferon-inducible cellular PKR protein kinase.
Recently, a 12 amino acid domain in the E2 protein of HCV (PKR-eIF2 alpha phosphorylation homology domain [PePHD]) has been reported to bind with and block the virus replication inhibition ability of PKR, suggesting that the interaction of E2 and PKR may be one mechanism by which HCV circumvents the antiviral effect of IFN.