Down regulation of MLH1 gene expression/loss of the MLH1 protein (OR 12; CI 2.8-53.1) was observed in BC cases, illustrating its potential role in disease development.
Statistical analysis demonstrated that MLH1 and MSH2 deficiency may lead breast cancer progression to advanced stage, correlated with tumor focality (MLH1 P = 0.001; MSH2 P = 0.002) and chemotherapy (MLH1 P = 0.01; MSH2 P = 0.04).
MMR deficiency was observed in 0.04% of breast cancers; the single MMR-deficient case was a high-grade, triple-negative ductal carcinoma which showed dual loss of MLH1 and PMS2 proteins and expressed PD-L1.
Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to explore the role of RARβ2, DAPK, hMLH1, p14, and p15 promoter hypermethylation in the susceptibility and clinical progression of breast cancer.
When evaluating by gene, the age-standardized breast cancer risks for MSH6 (SIR = 2.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.56-2.86) and PMS2 (SIR = 2.92; 95% CI, 2.17-3.92) were associated with a statistically significant risk for breast cancer whereas no association was observed for MLH1 (SIR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.42-1.83) or MSH2 (SIR = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.72-2.06).
Conversely, variants in the BRIP1 and RAD51C ovarian cancer risk genes; the MRE11A, RAD50, and NBN MRN complex genes; the MLH1 and PMS2 mismatch repair genes; and NF1 were not associated with increased risks of breast cancer.
We observed two two-way SNP-SNP interactions (APEX1-rs1130409 and RPAP1-rs2297381; MLH1-rs1799977 and MDM2-rs769412) in logistic regression that conferred elevated risks for breast cancer (P(interaction)<7.3 × 10(-3)).
Loss of the wild-type hMLH1 allele was detected in both breast tumors, thus suggesting that the MMR defect contributed to the development of the breast cancer.
Seven single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs3856806 in PPARG, rs7014346 in POU5F1P1, rs989902 in PTPN13, rs1801278 in IRS1, rs7003146 in TCF7L2, rs1503185 in PTPRJ, and rs63750447 in MLH1) were genotyped in Han Chinese subjects, including 216 patients with breast cancer and 216 matched controls, using the Sequenom MassARRAY platform.
WBC DNA methylation was analysed by bisulphite pyrosequencing at ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1), progesterone receptor (PGR), mutL homologue 1 (MLH1), breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA1), secreted frizzled-related protein 1 (SFRP1), stratifin (SFN), retinoic acid receptor beta (RARB) loci and the repetitive element LINE1 in 880 SCOTROC1 trial patients [paclitaxel (Taxol)-carboplatin versus docetaxel (Taxotere)-carboplatin as primary chemotherapy for stage Ic-IV epithelial ovarian cancer].
Decrease in the expression levels of TOP2A, MSH2 and MLH1 may play significant roles in the development of chemotherapeutic resistance to etoposide in breast cancer.
In a large-enrollment, sophomore-level laboratory course, groups of three to four students were assigned a gene associated with either breast cancer (brc-1), Wilson disease (cua-1), ovarian dysgenesis (fshr-1), or colon cancer (mlh-1).
Epigenetic silencing of essential components of DNA repair pathways is a common event in many tumor types, and comprise O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), human mut L homolog 1 (hMLH1), Werner syndrome gene (WRN), breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1), and genes of the Fanconi anemia pathway.
We observed hypermethylation of the hmlh1 gene in 43.5% of patients with primary breast cancer, of whom 66.9% had locally advanced breast cancer (stage IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC) (P < .0001).
Carrier frequency of the MLH1 -93 variant was higher in patients who developed therapy related acute myeloid leukaemia (t-AML) (75.0%, n = 12) or breast cancer (53.3%. n = 15) after methylating chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma compared to patients without previous methylating exposure (t-AML, 30.4%, n = 69; breast cancer patients, 27.2%, n = 22).
We correlated the immunoreactivity of the MMR proteins hMSH2, hMLH1 and PMS2 to the immunoreaction of p53, the proliferation marker Ki67 and clinical prognosis factors such as tumor grading and staging, steroid receptor expression and hemangiosis carcinomatosa or lymphangiosis carcinomatosa in 200 samples from patients with diagnosed breast cancer.
To address these issues, 83 archival breast cancer specimens were examined for expression of hMSH2 and hMLH1 by immunohistochemistry and the relationship between MMR protein expression and patient clinical background was analyzed.