Rs1682111 and rs843720 play a protective role in the additive model (rs1682111: OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52-0.93, p = 0.01; rs843720: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54-0.98, p = 0.04).While rs843645 G allele increased the risk of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer under the additive model (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02-2.00, p = 0.04).The haplotype analysis detected that "ATATCGCC" decreased the risk of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51-0.92, 95% CI: p = 0.013); however, "TGAGCGTC" increased the risk of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.04-2.10, p = 0.027).
Rs1682111 and rs843720 play a protective role in the additive model (rs1682111: OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52-0.93, p = 0.01; rs843720: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54-0.98, p = 0.04).While rs843645 G allele increased the risk of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer under the additive model (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02-2.00, p = 0.04).The haplotype analysis detected that "ATATCGCC" decreased the risk of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51-0.92, 95% CI: p = 0.013); however, "TGAGCGTC" increased the risk of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.04-2.10, p = 0.027).
Rs1682111 and rs843720 play a protective role in the additive model (rs1682111: OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52-0.93, p = 0.01; rs843720: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54-0.98, p = 0.04).While rs843645 G allele increased the risk of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer under the additive model (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02-2.00, p = 0.04).The haplotype analysis detected that "ATATCGCC" decreased the risk of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51-0.92, 95% CI: p = 0.013); however, "TGAGCGTC" increased the risk of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.04-2.10, p = 0.027).
Rs1682111 and rs843720 play a protective role in the additive model (rs1682111: OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52-0.93, p = 0.01; rs843720: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54-0.98, p = 0.04).While rs843645 G allele increased the risk of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer under the additive model (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02-2.00, p = 0.04).The haplotype analysis detected that "ATATCGCC" decreased the risk of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51-0.92, 95% CI: p = 0.013); however, "TGAGCGTC" increased the risk of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.04-2.10, p = 0.027).
Rs1682111 and rs843720 play a protective role in the additive model (rs1682111: OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52-0.93, p = 0.01; rs843720: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54-0.98, p = 0.04).While rs843645 G allele increased the risk of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer under the additive model (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02-2.00, p = 0.04).The haplotype analysis detected that "ATATCGCC" decreased the risk of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51-0.92, 95% CI: p = 0.013); however, "TGAGCGTC" increased the risk of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.04-2.10, p = 0.027).
Rs1682111 and rs843720 play a protective role in the additive model (rs1682111: OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52-0.93, p = 0.01; rs843720: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54-0.98, p = 0.04).While rs843645 G allele increased the risk of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer under the additive model (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02-2.00, p = 0.04).The haplotype analysis detected that "ATATCGCC" decreased the risk of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51-0.92, 95% CI: p = 0.013); however, "TGAGCGTC" increased the risk of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.04-2.10, p = 0.027).
In the allele model, ACYP2 rs843720 was protection against the occurrence of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.58-0.99, p = 0.04).
In the allele model, ACYP2 rs843720 was protection against the occurrence of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.58-0.99, p = 0.04).
In the allele model, ACYP2 rs843720 was protection against the occurrence of cirrhosis developed into liver cancer (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.58-0.99, p = 0.04).
Our results confirmed that rs6713088, rs843645, rs843711 and rs843706 were significantly increased liver cancer risk, but rs1682111, rs843720 and haplotypes (ATATCGCC and CG) were significantly decreased liver cancer risk in a Han Chinese population.
Our results confirmed that rs6713088, rs843645, rs843711 and rs843706 were significantly increased liver cancer risk, but rs1682111, rs843720 and haplotypes (ATATCGCC and CG) were significantly decreased liver cancer risk in a Han Chinese population.
Our results confirmed that rs6713088, rs843645, rs843711 and rs843706 were significantly increased liver cancer risk, but rs1682111, rs843720 and haplotypes (ATATCGCC and CG) were significantly decreased liver cancer risk in a Han Chinese population.
We found that rs6713088 (G allele: odds ratio [OR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.52, <i>P</i> = 0.007; GG vs. CC: OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.02-2.1, <i>P</i> = 0.038), rs843711 (T allele: OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.09-1.54, <i>P</i> = 0.004; TT vs. CC: OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.13-2.31, <i>P</i> = 0.008), rs843706 (A allele: OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.09-1.55, <i>P</i> = 0.003; AA vs. CC: OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.13-2.31, <i>P</i> = 0.008), and rs843645 (GG vs. AG: OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.07-1.82, <i>P</i> = 0.014) were associated with an increased risk of liver cancer.